From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Apr 07 11:05:46 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 73343 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2004 18:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Apr 2004 18:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2004 18:05:45 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BBHQl-0007S3-2B for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:05:43 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BBHPs-0007PK-Eu; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:04:48 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41901.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.152]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BBHPH-0007OD-Al for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:04:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20040407180335.15208.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41901.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:03:35 PDT Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:03:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040407175036.GA5197@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7486 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: CMENE=BRIVLA (was Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.") X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21959 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:17:46AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > Robin, will your parser be capable of > > dealing with {le broda joi mi}? > > Of course. Any wart that can be attributed to LR(1) limitations should > not exist in my parser, that was sort of the point. > > It already does, in fact, handle "le broda joi mi brode", and in the > right way: Great! That removes the only excuse for A as a separate selmaho from JA. JA should be merged with JOI and A be done away with. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/