From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Apr 16 01:06:29 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 92579 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2004 08:06:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Apr 2004 08:06:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2004 08:06:29 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BEOMj-0008Jb-O3 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:06:25 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BEOM8-0007gE-TY; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [151.189.20.158] (helo=postman.arcor.de) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BEOLw-0007Xe-Nh for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:05:36 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 (cou.ch [212.13.198.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id i3G85UYL024386 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:05:31 +0200 (MEST) Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:05:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <407FAFEA.25791.98F44@localhost> Priority: normal References: In-reply-to: <200404160120.48080.phma@webjockey.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 7556 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: "Philip Newton" From: "Philip Newton" Reply-To: pnewton@gmx.de Subject: [lojban] Re: le finpe X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22029 On 16 Apr 2004 at 1:20, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 16 April 2004 00:27, sshiskom wrote: > > le finpe cu danlu gi'e ponse le kamjybo'u gi'e xabju le djacu gi'e > > na'o ponse le fipfepri .e le fipybirka .e le fipypi'a > > This isn't a definition; it's a statement about some particular fish. If you > changed it to {ro finpe cu danlu li'o}, that makes it a universal statement, > which is closer to a definition. Or how about using {lo'e finpe}? mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn. li te'o te'a ka'o bi'e pi'i pai su'i pa du li no