From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 06 14:22:36 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 49198 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 21:22:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172)
  by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Apr 2004 21:22:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 21:22:34 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BAy1g-00051x-Ff
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:22:32 -0700
Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BAy0y-000512-Dc; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:21:48 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BAy0n-000509-Ss
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:21:37 -0700
Message-ID: <20040406212106.52171.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:21:06 PDT
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 14:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200404061655.07374.phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 7458
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Subject: [lojban] Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan."
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21925


--- Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 16:33, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > Ummm, CMENE = BRIVLA?  How does that work, exactly?
> 
> It can't without invalidating existing sentences. e.g. {la .alis. cusku}
> would 
> be just a sumti if CMENE=BRIVLA and LE=LA.

Yes, you would need a {cu} (or a {ku}) there.
(Of course a lot of existing sentences are invalid due 
to missing {cu}'s anyway, even in the most official texts.)

One additional advantage of the CMENE = BRIVLA move is
that it allows things like {la mikce jivagos} or
{la famti tom}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/