From phma@webjockey.net Fri Apr 02 07:36:09 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 13998 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 15:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Apr 2004 15:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 15:30:46 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6FEC2391; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:30:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404021030.44532.phma@webjockey.net> X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 208.150.110.21 From: Pierre Abbat Subject: all species of birds X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21890 There's a sentence which requires putting a prenex in a subordinate clause. {la fang. niukasl., noi te bilma fi lo cipni be roda, cu me loi pejrai je catryrai be le munje be'o ke cipni terbilma} is incorrect because no bird belongs to all species. How about these?: la fang. nuikasl. noi roda zo'u lo cipni be da cu bilma li'o la fang. nuikasl. noi ro se cipni zo'u lo cipni cu bilma li'o http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/ts_comments.php?id=P58579_0_10_0 phma -- li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa