From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Mon May 10 14:12:42 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BNI4h-0000kO-5i for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20040510211204.51275.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:04 PDT Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040510194533.GL5570@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7769 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > When you have "zei zei" you have to decide which one acts as glue and > > which one as lujvo component. Why would you take the second one as > > glue? > > See above. This may not be the 'right' thing, of course. Actually, your approach makes more sense, because zei is more likely to appear as a modifier than as the main component of a lujvo. That means {zei zei lujvo} would work for "zei-lujvo". The current grammar (and the official parser) has it the other way around though. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover