From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 13 11:25:46 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 May 2004 11:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BOKtl-00089P-Mw for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 May 2004 11:25:37 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 11:25:37 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "zo da bu" should not be valid (was Re: Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI) Message-ID: <20040513182537.GI4461@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040510191837.GK5570@digitalkingdom.org> <20040510193718.13449.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> <20040513063029.GU4461@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040513063029.GU4461@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7788 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:30:29PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > zo takes a single Lojban word. bu takes a single Lobjan word. si > takes as single word, or an arbitrary string of non-Lojban text. > > This is how they are defined. zei as well; "le lojbo zo irk zei seljmaji vreji" is invalid, but "le lojbo irk zei seljmaji vreji" is fine. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi