From pnewton@gmx.de Fri May 14 09:01:23 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 14 May 2004 09:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman4.arcor-online.net ([151.189.20.158] helo=postman.arcor.de) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.32) id 1BOf7c-0006GG-KG for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 09:01:17 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 (cou.ch [212.13.198.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id i4EG1AEQ004036 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 18:01:11 +0200 (MEST) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:01:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for? Message-ID: <40A50962.13656.184CE23@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20040513210600.77877.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040513193917.GC16333@fysh.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 7845 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 13 May 2004 at 14:06, Llambías wrote: > Right. None of si, sa, su, y, zei or bu should be allowed as > zoi delimiters, since delimiters are not scarce so it doesn't > make sense to block the more useful interpretation. What about zoi? Would that be allowed as a zoi delimiter? I seem to recall reading somewhere that it was a good "safe" choice as a zoi delimiter since, though I don't remember the reason. zoi zoi. Is this allowed? .zoi mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn. li te'o te'a ka'o bi'e pi'i pai su'i pa du li no