From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sat May 15 17:35:27 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 15 May 2004 17:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BP9cd-0007ev-2B for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 17:35:19 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 17:35:19 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Double-checking: "bu bu" Message-ID: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7870 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Is "bu bu" valid? I know "da bu bu" is, but that's not the same thing. (It's also an argument for BU acting on multi-word things like zei). -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi