From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun May 16 01:46:30 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 May 2004 01:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPHHo-0003TA-A1 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 May 2004 01:46:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 01:46:20 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text. Message-ID: <20040516084620.GC6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040515224035.GS6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040516013348.6797.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040516013348.6797.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7875 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 06:33:48PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Do there exist any elidable terminators that are not terminated by > > end-of-text? > > What do you mean? {ku} is an elidable terminator for {le}, but {le nu > fa'o} is not a grammatical utterance, for example. I don't mean what I thought I meant. Nevermind, sorry. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi