From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 17 10:06:40 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPlZP-0000bM-Gb for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu" Message-ID: <20040517170631.GJ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040517030525.GA28843@ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040517030525.GA28843@ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7891 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:05:25PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > On the other thread, I do think "zo .y." is a Good Thing, but I'm > willing to be persuaded otherwise It seems like it would be very common for newbies to hesitate while thinking of a word that they would like to ask about. Also see my examples in the other thread. I am, of course, more than happy to be overruled by the BPFK when it gets to the various words in question. > (presumably requiring "zoi zoi .y. zoi"?). Correct. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi