From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon May 10 13:22:57 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 84405 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 20:22:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166)
  by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 May 2004 20:22:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2004 20:22:57 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31)
	id 1BNHIG-0007kx-4J
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 10 May 2004 13:22:32 -0700
Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31)
	id 1BNHHf-0007jL-C2; Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:55 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31)
	id 1BNHHV-0007j7-4B
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:45 -0700
Resent-From: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:45 -0700
Resent-Message-ID: <20040510202145.GP5570@digitalkingdom.org>
Resent-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:20:30 -0700
Message-ID: <20040510202030.GO5570@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20040510191837.GK5570@digitalkingdom.org> <20040510193718.13449.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> <20040510194533.GL5570@digitalkingdom.org> <20040510200403.GV8616@skunk.reutershealth.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040510200403.GV8616@skunk.reutershealth.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Resent-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:45 -0700
X-archive-position: 7760
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
From: lojban-out@lojban.org
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22223

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:04:03PM -0400, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
> However, I would not want fu zei bar to become a single token, 

Just for the record, you know that grammar.300 currently does exactly
that, right?

> It wouldn't break my heart if "zei zei ..." runs were always illegal,
> though: that is, if zei could not act upon zei.

Nor mine.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi