From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue May 18 13:59:11 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 78737 invoked from network); 18 May 2004 20:59:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 May 2004 20:59:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 May 2004 20:59:10 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BQBd1-0001Cf-G7
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 18 May 2004 13:55:59 -0700
Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
	id 1BQBcB-0001BX-14; Tue, 18 May 2004 13:55:07 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 18 May 2004 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [195.167.170.152] (helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.32)
	id 1BQBbx-0001BF-VJ
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 13:54:54 -0700
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BQBbs-0000O9-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 21:54:48 +0100
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 21:54:48 +0100
Message-ID: <20040518205448.GB12891@fysh.org>
References: <20040518200547.39167.qmail@web40411.mail.yahoo.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0405181530420.28531@hilton.cec.wustl.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0405181530420.28531@hilton.cec.wustl.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-archive-position: 7905
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
From: Zefram <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: zefram@fysh.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: "Do you speak Lojban?"
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22368

Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
>Yes, either of those would be perfectly fine.  Personally, I'd use {.i xu do se
>bangu la lojban}, feels more direct.

If going in that direction, consider the more concise {xu do jbopli}.
I'd favour {xu do cusku bau la lojban} or {xu do tavla fo la lojban},
depending on context.

-zefram