From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Mon May 10 14:21:41 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 52258 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 21:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 May 2004 21:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2004 21:21:40 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BNIDR-0000sS-El for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:21:37 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BNICp-0000rs-RL; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:20:59 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 May 2004 14:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41903.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.154]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BNICf-0000qt-08 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:20:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20040510212018.72099.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:20:18 PDT Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:20:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040510200403.GV8616@skunk.reutershealth.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7770 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22233 --- jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote: > However, I would not want fu zei bar to become a single token, because > then "si" would dispose of all of it, which would be awkward for > na'e zei a zei bu zei na'e zei by zei livga terbilma > ("non-A, non-B hepatitis", now usually called "hepatitis C"). fu zei bar does become a single token currently, but this happens after si has already acted, so the above is not a problem. The only effect is that bu in {fu zei bar bu} sees a single token and creates a BY. > It wouldn't break my heart if "zei zei ..." runs were always illegal, though: > that is, if zei could not act upon zei. I think Robin's approach for this is the Right Thing: the second zei is the glue, so {zei zei broda} is as well behaved as any other lujvo. In a string of more than one {zei}, the evens have to be glue and the odd ones glued rather than the other way around as is currently the case. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover