From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu May 27 14:09:35 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 51212 invoked from network); 27 May 2004 21:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 May 2004 21:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 May 2004 21:09:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BTS84-0001Jq-0H for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:09:32 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BTS7M-0000ko-DO; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:08:48 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 27 May 2004 14:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BTS73-0000QE-L3 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:08:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20040527210758.70420.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:07:58 PDT Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7980 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban Flag X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22439 --- pedagoguery wrote: > I've put up a few more quick designs in the "graphics" directory. I > think A and D are best. Design D is more explicit with the > Cartesian system, while A is less of an abrupt change from the > official design. I like design A. But I'm not sure blue on blue looks flaggy enough. The official colors of Lojban should be {cicna} and {nukni}. It is so strange to have these two as basic color terms, that there must be a reason for them, they must be very important in Lojbanistan. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/