From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri May 07 14:29:34 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 80007 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 21:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 May 2004 21:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 May 2004 21:29:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCuR-0001Nw-Ul for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 07 May 2004 14:29:32 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCtq-0000xy-TI; Fri, 07 May 2004 14:28:54 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 May 2004 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCtf-0000xa-6h for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 May 2004 14:28:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20040507212811.65944.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 May 2004 14:28:11 PDT Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 14:28:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040507205742.GG27947@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7697 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22163 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > While I'm at it, if ZO+word and ZOI+clause are treated as one word, then > "zo .y. si co valsi" is invalid, right? I was going to ask what you do with {y}. I would propose that {y} be totally ignored, so {zoi y gy ... gy} should be valid. Then you couldn't quote it with {zo}, you'd have to say {zoi ly y ly}... But then {.y.bu} would require special treatment... It's really weird that you can't hesitate after certain words, especially after zoi, which is a place where I expect hesitation, while you think of an appropriate delimiter. In any case, responding to your question, yes {zo ca si co valsi} would be invalid. It is invalid now, according to grammar .300, but for a different reason. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover