From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Mon May 10 14:13:23 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 93189 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 21:13:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 May 2004 21:13:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2004 21:13:22 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BNI5P-0000lj-Qt for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:13:20 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BNI4r-0000l6-DM; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:45 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BNI4h-0000kO-5i for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20040510211204.51275.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:04 PDT Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:12:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040510194533.GL5570@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7769 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22232 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > When you have "zei zei" you have to decide which one acts as glue and > > which one as lujvo component. Why would you take the second one as > > glue? > > See above. This may not be the 'right' thing, of course. Actually, your approach makes more sense, because zei is more likely to appear as a modifier than as the main component of a lujvo. That means {zei zei lujvo} would work for "zei-lujvo". The current grammar (and the official parser) has it the other way around though. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover