From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Mon May 17 10:34:13 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 87654 invoked from network); 17 May 2004 17:34:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 May 2004 17:34:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 May 2004 17:34:11 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPm00-0000r0-HF for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:34:00 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPlzF-0000qT-JR; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:33:13 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 17 May 2004 10:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPlz3-0000q1-Qt for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:33:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20040517173230.87832.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:32:30 PDT Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:32:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040517170631.GJ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7892 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22355 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I am, of course, more than happy to be overruled by the BPFK when it > gets to the various words in question. Perhaps we should revisit at some point the definition approved for "bu": bu Combines with the previous word to make a Lojban letteral, provided that it is not one of the quote cmavo (ZO, ZOI, LOhU, LEhU) or one of the erasure cmavo (SI, SA, SU), ZEI, BAhE, or FAhO. [...] if {zoi bu} is now to be allowed. I understand {zo y bu si si da} reduces to {zo da}. Does {zo y bu si da} reduce to {zo y da}, i.e. {zo da} too? mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price. http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/