From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon May 17 10:07:37 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 53800 invoked from network); 17 May 2004 17:07:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 May 2004 17:07:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 May 2004 17:07:36 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPlaP-0000cU-UH for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:07:34 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BPlZc-0000bb-7g; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BPlZP-0000bM-Gb for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20040517170631.GJ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040516003519.GZ6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040517030525.GA28843@ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040517030525.GA28843@ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7891 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Double-checking: "bu bu" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22354 On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:05:25PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > On the other thread, I do think "zo .y." is a Good Thing, but I'm > willing to be persuaded otherwise It seems like it would be very common for newbies to hesitate while thinking of a word that they would like to ask about. Also see my examples in the other thread. I am, of course, more than happy to be overruled by the BPFK when it gets to the various words in question. > (presumably requiring "zoi zoi .y. zoi"?). Correct. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi