From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat May 15 15:36:55 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 23611 invoked from network); 15 May 2004 22:36:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m22.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2004 22:36:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2004 22:36:54 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7le-0001yB-9V for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:36:30 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7ky-0001wu-AJ; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:48 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7kl-0001wZ-MQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:35 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 15:35:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20040515223535.GR6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040514003615.GQ4461@digitalkingdom.org> <20040514005321.96954.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040514005321.96954.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7868 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22331 On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:53:21PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > SI was operating on Y. Oops. Fixed. > > > > It now says: > > > > sumti6=( ZO=( zo ) zoClause=( y y y si nalselmorjyvalsi ) > > absorbIndicators=() free=() ) > > So Y is not a word from the point of view of SI, except when ZO has > recognized it as one, right? That is what I was doing, but I've backpedalled. I agree with you: treating Y as a word for purposes of ZO and ZEI is just too damned unintuitive. Barring someone objecting in a convincing fashion, my parser treats Y as a space except for Y+BU. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi