From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri May 14 09:29:48 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 76462 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 16:29:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 May 2004 16:29:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 May 2004 16:29:47 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BOfW8-0006lh-Ai for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 14 May 2004 09:26:36 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BOfVZ-0006kc-0t; Fri, 14 May 2004 09:26:01 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 14 May 2004 09:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BOfVM-0006kL-7q for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 09:25:48 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:25:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20040514162548.GT4461@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040513193917.GC16333@fysh.org> <40A50962.13656.184CE23@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40A50962.13656.184CE23@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7848 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: y: what is it good for? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22312 On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:01:06PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > On 13 May 2004 at 14:06, Llamb?as wrote: > > > Right. None of si, sa, su, y, zei or bu should be allowed as zoi > > delimiters, since delimiters are not scarce so it doesn't make sense > > to block the more useful interpretation. > > What about zoi? Would that be allowed as a zoi delimiter? There's no good reason why not; all of those other cases have obvious alternative meanings. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi