From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed May 05 08:30:50 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 35876 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 15:30:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 May 2004 15:30:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.36) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 May 2004 15:30:49 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (mail [65.246.141.36]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02073; Wed, 5 May 2004 11:23:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 5 May 2004 11:29:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:29:44 -0400 To: la_okus Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <20040505152944.GA9076@skunk.reutershealth.com> References: <20040501125134.GA1255@fysh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 65.246.141.36 From: jcowan@reutershealth.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Why capital letters standing in for letterals is a *bad* idea. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22127 la_okus scripsit: > Good idea. This would probably be even better than using > acutes, because I don't believe there are any acutes for r or l, > which we would need. And since its ASCII, RLP should be happy > too :-) Both r-acute and l-acute are found in Unicode. The complete list is a, c, e, g, i, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, u, w, y, z, and ae. In addition, other letters can be composed using the COMBINING ACUTE. -- Is not a patron, my Lord [Chesterfield], John Cowan one who looks with unconcern on a man http://www.ccil.org/~cowan struggling for life in the water, and when http://www.reutershealth.com he has reached ground encumbers him with help? jcowan@reutershealth.com --Samuel Johnson