From xeubie@hotmail.com Mon May 10 13:09:23 2004
Return-Path: <xeubie@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: xeubie@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 92248 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 20:09:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
  by m18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 May 2004 20:09:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n33.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.101)
  by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2004 20:09:22 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.161] by n33.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 May 2004 20:08:10 -0000
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:08:10 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <c7onfa+o1sj@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040510200130.GN5570@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 288
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.66.101
From: "la_okus" <xeubie@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: 69.162.47.2
Subject: ZOI (Re: my new idea for onomato's)
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=170795535
X-Yahoo-Profile: la_okus
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22222

--- Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> I have no idea why ZOI isn't sufficient for this purpose, though.

Actually I just got to thinking that sa'ei could be part of ZOI; the 
onomatopoeia themselves would be the deliminating words, but 
the computer shouldn't know the difference.