From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Sat May 15 15:23:39 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 79033 invoked from network); 15 May 2004 22:23:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2004 22:23:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2004 22:23:39 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7Z8-0001ip-0b for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:23:34 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7YU-0001iC-02; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:22:54 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 15 May 2004 15:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BP7YJ-0001eK-NE for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:22:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20040515222213.71303.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.219] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:22:13 PDT Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 15:22:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040515221246.GM6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7866 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: .iseca'obo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22329 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 03:00:46PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Hint: it doesn't mean anything; ca'o has no places, and thus can't > > > take SE. > > > > Any sumti tcita must relate two things, the sumti it tags and the > > event it modifies, so SE makes as much sense on any tag as it does on > > BAI. > > Be that as it may, and I have no idea if I agree or not, that's > definately not how things are currently defined. I only wanted to point out that your "thus" was unjustified. I know {se co'a} is currently undefined, but it has an obvious definition that follows from how SE acts on other tags. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price. http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/