From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri May 07 13:58:29 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 99553 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 20:58:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 May 2004 20:58:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 May 2004 20:58:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCQN-0000O6-Fh for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 07 May 2004 13:58:27 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCPo-0000Nf-He; Fri, 07 May 2004 13:57:52 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 May 2004 13:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BMCPe-0000NU-SB for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 May 2004 13:57:43 -0700 Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:57:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20040507205742.GG27947@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040507204023.GA27947@digitalkingdom.org> <20040507205000.22735.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> <20040507205213.GE27947@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040507205213.GE27947@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7689 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: My parser, SI, SA, and ZOI X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22155 On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:52:13PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:50:00PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > It is this behaviour that I am trying to emulate, without being a > > > slave to YACC restrictions (which, for example, make it so that > > > "zoi da weeble da si si si si" works, but no lesser number of "si" > > > after the zoi have any effect. > > > > It's a good thing to get rid of that effect, and your solution for > > {si} is not bad, but I think Nora's suggestion is more parsimonious > > and extendable to similar problems that occur with {bu} and {zei}. > > So you think that "zoi gy weebles are the best! gy zei klama" should, > in fact, be treated as a lujvo? While I'm at it, if ZO+word and ZOI+clause are treated as one word, then "zo .y. si co valsi" is invalid, right? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi