Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:32:24 -0700
Message-ID: <20040723173223.GA1876@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040722235721.GE2295@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040723144501.58767.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040723144501.58767.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: mekso samples.
Content-Length: 947
Lines: 37

On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:45:01AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> Robin:
> > You all might be interested to see
> > 
> > http://www.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/regular/test.pdf
> > 
> > which has Lojban followed by the results of the LaTeX mode of my
> > parser on said Lojban.
> > 
> > It's pretty intense, and is (as far as I know) the first usage of
> > ge'o.
> 
> Very nice! I mean the formulas, not the lojban :) 

:-P

> One random comment: the "i" in 2*pi*i is almost certainly {ka'o}, not
> {ibu}, i.e. {ka'o re pai}, assuming we take {repai} as a product.

I have no idea what was intended, unfortunately.  It's been too long
since I did this sort of thing; is e^{2 * pai * ka'o} common?  g{ ge'o o
bu } is a Fourier transform, btw.

> Also, in the final integral, 

Ignore that for now.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"