From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Jul 13 09:17:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 78304 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2004 16:17:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Jul 2004 16:17:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2004 16:17:40 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BkPvH-0006Z4-Mp for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:14:27 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BkPub-0006Y9-UC; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:46 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BkPuK-0006Xs-8c for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:28 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:13:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20040713161327.GO7925@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040713070716.GM7925@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040713123726.61955.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> <20040713150209.GH26687@ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040713150209.GH26687@ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-archive-position: 8240 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Flexible! Except when we're not. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22666 On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:02:09AM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Jorge Llamb?as scripsit: > > > What was the reason {jo'i} is not in VUhU? > > Because it is designed for specifying vectors or tuples. "pi'e" > should not be used for this purpose. That's good to know, and implies that (for example) we should be using jo'i for times and dates in most cases, but it doesn't actually answer the question. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"