From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jul 22 08:32:59 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 21080 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 15:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Jul 2004 15:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 15:32:59 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BnfYs-0002kd-QC for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:32:47 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BnfXa-0002he-4p; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:31:26 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal.seas.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.102]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BnfXN-0002gq-Fx for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:31:13 -0700 Received: from clarion.cec.wustl.edu (clarion.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.3]) by postal.seas.wustl.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6MFRdE05824 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:27:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by clarion.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i6MFV9M3022452 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:31:10 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: clarion.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:31:09 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <20040722151938.GT2295@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: References: <20040722151938.GT2295@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, -7.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: -7.1/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results -7.10 points, 5 required; * 0.0 -- Message-Id indicates a non-spam MUA (Pine) * -0.0 -- Has a valid-looking References header * -0.4 -- Has a X-Authentication-Warning header * -0.4 -- Has a In-Reply-To header * -0.5 -- BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution * -5.4 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 1 to 10% [score: 0.0138] * -0.4 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text * 0.0 -- Reply with quoted text ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-archive-position: 8276 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: "Adam D. Lopresto" From: "Adam D. Lopresto" Reply-To: adam@pubcrawler.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "Yes", but not "go'i" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22700 On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > This comes out of the phone conversations xorxes and xod and I had. I'm > looking for a way to say "yes" in the sense of "that is correct". We > have ".ie" for one form of "yes", and "go'i" for another. Would ".e'e" > work for the third? I've also been using just bare "drani". Perhaps {je'u} or {je'udai} would do it? -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ Her hair glistened in the rain like nose hair after a sneeze. (Chuck Smith, Woodbridge)