From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Jul 24 21:59:34 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 82575 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 04:59:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jul 2004 04:59:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 04:59:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1Bob5y-0004KM-VO for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:58:47 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bob5M-0004Jq-29; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:58:08 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.204] helo=mproxy.gmail.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bob59-0004Jg-1a for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:57:55 -0700 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so41166rnl for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.104.67 with SMTP id b67mr299457rnc; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <537d06d0040724215762aaace8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 06:57:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040724191216.GC1623@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII References: <537d06d0040724003156531e7@mail.gmail.com> <20040724191216.GC1623@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-archive-position: 8330 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: philip.newton@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Philip Newton From: Philip Newton Reply-To: philip.newton@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Projects X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22753 On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:12:16 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:31:38AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > Comparing {lo} and {da} is comparing apples and onions. > > Ummm, *NO*. > > "lo broda" is defined in the CLL as meaning "su'o da poi broda". OK, but they play very different roles syntactically, as I'm sure you'll agree - that is, you cannot replace my suggested "da broda" with his suggested "lo broda" in the same sentence. That's really what I was trying to get at. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- Philip Newton