From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jul 01 16:04:46 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 48009 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 23:04:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Jul 2004 23:04:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 23:04:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BgAbj-0002qG-Bv for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:04:43 -0700 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BgAb6-0002pe-T6; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:04:04 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BgAau-0002pK-TF for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:03:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:03:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20040701230352.GF28169@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040630165331.GP17338@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040614041459.GG10520@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <40E1E107.7000109@thestonecutters.net> <20040630165331.GP17338@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20040701183304.0337ae10@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20040701183304.0337ae10@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-archive-position: 8187 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Mini-Logfest in CA? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22619 On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:44:28PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > At 01:15 PM 6/30/04 -0400, xod wrote: > >Judging from the response, you'd be the only one who did. I assume > >there are lurkers who would appear yet are remaining silent in this > >discussion, but there's no way anyone can be expected to book a hotel > >suite without quite a bit more enthusiasm. > > One reason why I was never enthusiastic about going from our house to > hotels for LogFest. Well, you're welcome to run one at your house again if you like. > Really, it seems like the three of you: Mark, Robin, and you strongly > prefer a hotel, and everyone else prefers to be noncommittal and to > decide on the spur of the moment whether to attend, which makes > non-hotel a preference. That may be true, but the people who actually *responded* last time I asked all seemed to prefer a hotel. A majority certainly. I'm not psychic. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"