Return-Path: X-Sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 73826 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2004 15:17:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Jul 2004 15:17:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m24.mx.aol.com) (64.12.137.5) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 15:17:38 -0000 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r2.6.) id r.140.2f8dbc85 (3874) for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:17:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <140.2f8dbc85.2e3bc087@wmconnect.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:17:27 EDT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_140.2f8dbc85.2e3bc087_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 12 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.12.137.5 From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: jimpe X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=137764184 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22781 Content-Length: 2887 Lines: 67 --part1_140.2f8dbc85.2e3bc087_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2004-07-30 10:03:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes: > We're submitting an extended abstract about the system to the Student Oxygen > Workshop at MIT ("Oxygen" is this nebulous all-encompassing project with lots > of funding). I've put up the paper at: > http://mohican.lids.mit.edu/lojban/jimpe_sow.pdf . If people want to give me > comments on the paper (such as, how I present Lojban to an audience that's > probably going to say "wait a minute, you're doing natural language > processing > without the natural language?") before I submit the paper tomorrow, that > would > be great. > That is *so* cool. But is the logic in the first example (section 4.1) valid? It seems to be deducing a premise from a consequence, which I've always thought was a big no-no. And then "artificial" in the title. stevo --part1_140.2f8dbc85.2e3bc087_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 2004-07-30 10:03:= 40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, lojban@yahoogroups.com writes:


We're submitting an exten= ded abstract about the system to the Student Oxygen
Workshop at MIT ("Oxygen" is this nebulous all-encompassing project wit= h lots
of funding).  I've put up the paper at:
http://mohican.lids.mit.edu/lojban/jimpe_sow.pdf .  If people want= to give me
comments on the paper (such as, how I present Lojban to an audience tha= t's
probably going to say "wait a minute, you're doing natural language pro= cessing
without the natural language?") before I submit the paper tomorrow, tha= t would
be great.


That is *so* cool.  But is the logic in the first example (section= 4.1) valid?  It seems to be deducing a premise from a consequence, wh= ich I've always thought was a big no-no.  And then  "artificial" = in the title.  

stevo --part1_140.2f8dbc85.2e3bc087_boundary--