From a.rosta@v21.me.uk Tue Jul 27 15:16:06 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@v21.me.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 58627 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 22:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2004 22:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk) (62.41.128.20) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 22:16:06 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-53-70.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.53.70]) by heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i6RLVee32024 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:31:40 +0100 Message-ID: <00de01c47427$41e6ae40$fd3f0751@oemcomputer> To: References: <20040727194035.93302.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> <00d101c47424$785fb780$fd3f0751@oemcomputer> <4106D1F4.9040005@thestonecutters.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:15:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 62.41.128.20 From: "And Rosta" Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Test sentences X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=175222075 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22766 xod: > And Rosta wrote: > > >xorxes: > > > >>36. Cicero is Tully > >> > >> la kikeros cu du la tulis > > Thank you for not translating it as la siseros. A pedant, in the Nick Nicholas mould, say, would prefer kikeron and tulius. > >Given the ragbag and decontextualized nature of the test sentence > >collection, the translation is reasonable, but as you are aware, > >it completely sidesteps the issues that make (36) a challenging > >test sentence in the first place. Change it to, say, "John > >does not believe that Cicero is Tully", and the challenge becomes > >more apparent. (The solution is to have brivla for "Cicero" > >and "Tully" & then it all works out hunkydory.) > > Why? Because we're using "me"? "Cicero is Tully" is sensitive to intensional contexts (e.g. as x2 of "believe"). Lojban can capture opaque & transparent readings when brivla are involved, but not when cmene are involved. Cmene are like {le} gadri, and are insensitive to intensional contexts. --And.