From a.rosta@v21.me.uk Thu Jul 29 07:46:14 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@v21.me.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 80478 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 14:46:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Jul 2004 14:46:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk) (62.41.128.20) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 14:46:07 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-60-215.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.60.215]) by heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i6TE1De14808 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:01:13 +0100 Message-ID: <01c501c4757a$c5ae2240$fd3f0751@oemcomputer> To: References: <20040728192926.72748.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:04:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 62.41.128.20 From: "And Rosta" Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Test sentences X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=175222075 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22774 xorxes: > --- And: > > Who knows -- it depends on what {lu'e} ends up meaning, & > > a load of other conventions yet to be settled. But as I said, > > Lojban can definitely capture the relevant distinction by > > using brivla ("du zei kikeron", say) instead of cmene. > > That would be {la djan na krici lo du'u su'o da du zei kikeron > gi'e du zei tulius}, right? or "ro da ... gi'o". Or with XS lo, "du'u du lo du zei kikeron lo du zei tulius". They're not equivalent, but all seem valid renditions. --And.