From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Fri Aug 13 16:39:31 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [216.189.121.177] (helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Bvldr-0007Ti-Rl
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:39:24 -0700
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 2272D4963; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 23:38:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: bifce
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:38:47 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <cfjhji+9qhr@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <cfjhji+9qhr@eGroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200408131938.48047.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-archive-position: 8447
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Friday 13 August 2004 19:07, sshiskom wrote:
> Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > What words can we use to distinguish bees and any other
> > bifce that might need distinguishing?
>
> I once used {sakta bifce} for honeybee. Does that work?

Sounds good to me (or the lujvo {satybifce}). For bees in general, what about 
{rulbifce}?

phma

-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa