From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Aug 18 15:37:23 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZ3T-0000id-Pn for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:37:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20040818223646.45956.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.41] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:36:46 PDT Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:36:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: use of {co'e} and other cmavo in lujvo To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20040818221529.GK19287@skunk.reutershealth.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8493 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- John Cowan wrote: > > Then there's {jomcmi}. That is glossed as "set union" but the place > > structure has a stray "j" and doesn't make sense. Since {jo'e} has no > > place structure and there's nothing preceding it, I'm stumped. > > Presumably you want an ad hoc structure like x1 is the union of set x2 > and set x3, or x1 is the union of the set of sets x2. {jomcmi} is clearly about the members of the union. I suggest {jomsumji} for "x1 is the union of set x2 and set x3". mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail