From zefram@fysh.org Mon Aug 23 17:38:42 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fysh.org
	([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1BzPKb-0008Am-J8
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:38:33 -0700
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BzPKY-0000YN-00
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:38:30 +0100
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:38:30 +0100
From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: ibaubo
Message-ID: <20040824003830.GA1197@fysh.org>
References: <200408230639.36111.phma@phma.hn.org> <20040823184559.GP3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040823224401.GA18730@fysh.org> <20040823224713.GL3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040823224713.GL3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-archive-position: 8545
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>Right.  Why not use ".i se bau bo" ?

That would be "with language user ..."?

>> I didn't realise one could do that with "bau".
>
>You can do it with any BAI.

But BAI takes a sumti, whereas the sentence being used as this argument
could contain a bridi rather than just a sumti.  How would "broda ibaubo
brode" be treated?  I think I've missed something; BAI seems to be in
a lot more places in the grammar than I can explaim.

-zefram