From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Aug 29 18:48:39 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C1bHc-0006iP-IA
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:48:32 -0700
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:48:32 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: made-up examples?
Message-ID: <20040830014832.GM19475@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <200408292141.47918.phma@phma.hn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200408292141.47918.phma@phma.hn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 8577
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:41:47PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> Are BPFK members allowed to make up examples of usage? pne's sig
> has three of my cmavo in one sentence, and I can find {tu'o}
> easily enough, but I don't think there's been much use of {ci'i}
> in its different mathematical senses.

Yes, absolutely.  Several of xorxes' examples are artificial.

I tried not to in my case, because it didn't seem to be necessary.

-Robin