Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 70758 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 00:43:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2004 00:43:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 00:43:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzPPI-0008GP-Go for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:43:24 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzPOb-0008Fg-7g; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:42:41 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzPOO-0008FQ-Tk for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:42:29 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:42:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20040824004228.GR3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <200408230639.36111.phma@phma.hn.org> <20040823184559.GP3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040823224401.GA18730@fysh.org> <20040823224713.GL3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040824003830.GA1197@fysh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040824003830.GA1197@fysh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-archive-position: 8546 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ibaubo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22963 Content-Length: 750 Lines: 30 On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:38:30AM +0100, Zefram wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >Right. Why not use ".i se bau bo" ? > > That would be "with language user ..."? Yes. > >> I didn't realise one could do that with "bau". > > > >You can do it with any BAI. > > But BAI takes a sumti, whereas the sentence being used as this > argument could contain a bridi rather than just a sumti. How > would "broda ibaubo brode" be treated? I have no idea what that transforms to exactly; the BPFK hasn't gotten that far. But note that this sort of thing is used all the time as ".i ri'a bo" and such. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"