Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 82506 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 05:00:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2004 05:00:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 05:00:43 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzTPV-0003Ua-PG for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:59:53 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzTOq-0003Tr-8m; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:59:12 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzTOd-0003Tf-Eb for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:58:59 -0700 Resent-From: rlpowell@chain.digitalkingdom.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:58:59 -0700 Resent-Message-ID: <20040824045859.GA13346@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Resent-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Received: from [65.246.141.36] (helo=mail.reutershealth.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzQjC-0001Di-UL for rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:08:03 -0700 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (mail [65.246.141.36]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA23959 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:00:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:08:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:08:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20040824020804.GC2128@skunk.reutershealth.com> References: <200408230639.36111.phma@phma.hn.org> <20040823184559.GP3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040823224401.GA18730@fysh.org> <20040823224713.GL3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040824003830.GA1197@fysh.org> <20040824004228.GR3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040824004228.GR3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Resent-Sender: Robin Lee Powell Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:58:59 -0700 X-archive-position: 8548 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: John Cowan Reply-To: rlpowell@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ibaubo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22965 Content-Length: 812 Lines: 23 Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > I have no idea what that transforms to exactly; the BPFK hasn't > gotten that far. But note that this sort of thing is used all the > time as ".i ri'a bo" and such. As CLL says, not all I+tag+bo makes sense, only ones where the argument of the underlying bridi can be an event. broda .iri'abo brode means le nu broda cu rink le nu brode (I may have this backwards), except that it asserts broda and brode, which the rinka version does not. Neither bangu nor se bangu can reasonably be an event, so such sentences are basically false and/or nonsense. -- A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax." John Cowan Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?" jcowan@reutershealth.com --"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists http://www.ccil.org/~cowan