From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Aug 19 02:26:26 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 38470 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2004 09:26:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Aug 2004 09:26:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2004 09:26:26 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BxjAu-0005ha-RO
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:25:37 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BxjAH-0005gN-18; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:24:57 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fysh.org
	([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1BxjA0-0005fv-0z
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:24:41 -0700
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Bxj9j-0003Ww-00
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:24:23 +0100
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:24:23 +0100
Message-ID: <20040819092423.GB3076@fysh.org>
References: <20040817235553.GZ3538@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040818084944.GB24841@fysh.org> <20040818191959.GG13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040818191959.GG13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-archive-position: 8500
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
From: Zefram <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: zefram@fysh.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: samselpli ?
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22919

In building lujvo, is it required that "samselpli" and "sampli" express
the same relationship (but with permuted places), in the manner that
"selpli" and "pilno" express the same relationship?  Currently we have
"samselpli" and "sampli" defined with different sets of places.

-zefram