From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Aug 18 16:22:29 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 38542 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 23:22:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Aug 2004 23:22:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 23:22:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZlB-0001wj-GJ for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:22:25 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZkT-0001vh-9I; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:21:41 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZkF-0001uv-OJ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:21:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20040818232058.60003.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.43.213.41] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:58 PDT Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200408181857.51329.phma@phma.hn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8496 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: use of {co'e} and other cmavo in lujvo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22915 --- Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Wednesday 18 August 2004 18:20, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > sazri. li'a sai. > > Not necessarily. If the post has a steering wheel or some such control, then > {sazri} is appropriate, but if it's a lookout post, then no. We want something like "x1 occupies post x2". How about selcu'u: "x1 is engaged in x2". ko selcu'u le zgajibri "Be engaged in the lookout post." mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail