From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Aug 19 17:47:49 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 34196 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2004 00:47:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Aug 2004 00:47:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2004 00:47:47 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxxZ7-0007q1-NU for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:47:34 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxxY0-0007nV-4Q; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:46:24 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxxXo-0007nH-C3 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:46:12 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:46:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20040820004612.GW5127@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040817235553.GZ3538@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040818084944.GB24841@fysh.org> <20040818191959.GG13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040819083433.GA3076@fysh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040819083433.GA3076@fysh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-archive-position: 8503 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: samselpli ? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22921 On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 09:34:33AM +0100, Zefram wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >Unfortunately, I think you're right. I sometimes forget the paucity > >of computer knowledge of the average user; if I found other things to > >put in a generalized lujvo for "program" (say, required operating > >system or processor, just to pool a couple of possible places out of > >my ganxo), the average user would literally have no idea how to fill > >them. > > I don't see anything so unfortunate about it. I don't think places > for OS and processor are appropriate for the lujvo we're talking > about. I was pulling those out of my ganxo, as I said. I don't think they are either. > >And sysadmins, like me, prefer samru'e. > > That would be a "process" in the Unix sense? That's how I often use it, but it's much more general than that. It just means "running program". -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"