From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Aug 15 15:19:33 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 94107 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2004 22:19:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Aug 2004 22:19:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Aug 2004 22:19:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BwTLe-0003bl-MF for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:19:30 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BwTL3-0003b4-Oo; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:18:53 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BwTKq-0003ap-OH for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:18:40 -0700 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:18:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20040815221840.GB2210@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <149.307305fd.2e4d48f7@wmconnect.com> <20040812223150.GM30673@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <411CE083.3070909@thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <411CE083.3070909@thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-archive-position: 8454 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: only one lujvo per concept? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22874 On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 11:38:43AM -0400, xod wrote: > The breadth of a lujvo is whatever we say it is. > > How does mucti minji cover algorithms more than skami selplatu, or > skami pruce? An algorithm has nothing to do with computers, for one thing. > If you were not a computer geek, why would you think of an application > as a "plan/arrangement/plot/[schematic]" or any sort of process? Code, and a running program respectively. mutmi'i is the best I'm aware of for "compiled code that's not actually running", but I've almost never hand to use that. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"