Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 75915 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 00:39:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Aug 2004 00:39:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 00:39:37 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BzPLY-0008Bt-Uf for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:39:33 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzPKp-0008B9-Aj; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:38:47 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fysh.org ([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1BzPKb-0008Am-J8 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:38:33 -0700 Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BzPKY-0000YN-00 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:38:30 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:38:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20040824003830.GA1197@fysh.org> References: <200408230639.36111.phma@phma.hn.org> <20040823184559.GP3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040823224401.GA18730@fysh.org> <20040823224713.GL3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040823224713.GL3257@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-archive-position: 8545 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Zefram From: Zefram Reply-To: zefram@fysh.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ibaubo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22962 Content-Length: 479 Lines: 20 Robin Lee Powell wrote: >Right. Why not use ".i se bau bo" ? That would be "with language user ..."? >> I didn't realise one could do that with "bau". > >You can do it with any BAI. But BAI takes a sumti, whereas the sentence being used as this argument could contain a bridi rather than just a sumti. How would "broda ibaubo brode" be treated? I think I've missed something; BAI seems to be in a lot more places in the grammar than I can explaim. -zefram