From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Aug 18 16:33:10 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 8827 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 23:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Aug 2004 23:33:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 23:33:09 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZvW-000275-Td for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:33:07 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZuk-00026E-AF; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:32:18 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxZuY-000263-1Y for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:32:06 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:32:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20040818233206.GC13226@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <200408181857.51329.phma@phma.hn.org> <20040818232058.60003.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040818232058.60003.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-archive-position: 8497 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: use of {co'e} and other cmavo in lujvo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22916 On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:20:58PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 August 2004 18:20, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > sazri. li'a sai. > > > > Not necessarily. If the post has a steering wheel or some such > > control, then {sazri} is appropriate, but if it's a lookout post, > > then no. > > We want something like "x1 occupies post x2". Aren't lookout posts usually places that command a view of the surrounding area? mi pilno le zbajibri lo nu xamgu viska -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"