From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Aug 11 14:07:06 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 8654 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 21:07:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Aug 2004 21:07:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 21:07:05 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1Bv0JH-0003Qo-TC for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:07:00 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Bv0IR-0003Or-KP; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:06:07 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1Bv0IG-0003OS-GP for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:05:56 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:05:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20040811210556.GH30673@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040811203139.GB30673@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040811210302.90966.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040811210302.90966.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i X-archive-position: 8418 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: The Lojban Wikipedia is up X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22838 On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:03:02PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > Robin wrote: > > lo latmo bangu cu farvi lo fraso bangu .e lo spano bangu .e li'e > > .e zo'e li'o I meant li'o, yes. > That's an example where {zo'e} is not elidable. Good point. Thanks. > > .i la atik cu farvi lo xelso bangu po'o > > Strictly you need {ku po'o}, otherwise {po'o} modifies just {bangu} > instead of {lo xelso bangu}. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"