From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Thu Sep 02 06:02:22 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [216.189.121.177] (helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C2rE4-0005bg-2F
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:02:04 -0700
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B00634B1C; Thu,  2 Sep 2004 13:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] no'o et al.: which BPFK section?
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:01:29 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200409020901.30613.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-archive-position: 8587
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

PA5 contains xo, ci'i, no'o, ka'o, pai, te'o, and tu'o. Of these, ci'i, ka'o, 
pai, and te'o are mathematical constants, and no'o is in BPFK Section: 
Inexact Numbers. Should no'o be in Mathematical Constants, or where should xo 
and tu'o go?

phma
-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa