From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Sep 22 11:25:59 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 98957 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 18:25:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2004 18:25:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 18:25:58 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CABoI-0008KK-PT
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:25:46 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CABnM-0008JW-8p; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:48 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CABmn-0008Ia-GY
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:13 -0700
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:13 -0700
Message-ID: <20040922182413.GK1650@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <8a.15bd704a.2e82b504@wmconnect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8a.15bd704a.2e82b504@wmconnect.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
X-archive-position: 8649
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: fractions
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23059

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 06:59:16AM -0400,
MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote:
> If "pimu" (.5) is to be used for 1/2 (which practice I abhor),
> then how is a number like 1/3 to be expressed?  Or 1/17, for a
> more complicated example.

li pi ra'e ci

li pa fi'u ci

li pa fe'i ci

The other:

li pi ra'e no mu bi bi re ci mu re so vo pa pa ze xa vo ze

li pa fi'u pa ze

li pa fe'i pa ze

I personally loathe fi'u, because it's in PA instead of VUhU, which
makes things not work as you'd expect at *all*.  For example, (1+2)
over (2+3) can't be done using fi'u:

li vei pa su'i re ve'u fi'u vei re su'i ci -- unparseable, because
fi'u is not an operator.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"