From MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Wed Sep 22 04:23:53 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 90147 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 11:23:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2004 11:23:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 11:23:53 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CA5Dv-0007Vj-7M for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:23:47 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CA5Cl-0007Od-TJ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:22:37 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.208]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CA5Bn-0007Jx-QA for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:21:40 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id d.5b.599daccc (17079) for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:20:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5b.599daccc.2e82ba16@wmconnect.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:20:54 EDT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_5b.599daccc.2e82ba16_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 12 X-archive-position: 8646 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Reply-To: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: [lojban] tanru exercise X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=137764184 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23056 --part1_5b.599daccc.2e82ba16_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2004-09-22 5:21:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Jim Carter < jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU> via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > It's an article of faith that people are supposed to be able to understand > a lujvo, or its underlying tanru, that they have never heard before. > Usually it works pretty well, but this one fell on its face. No, I think the test worked very well. It just shows that the concept is not one that people were familiar enough with to know what you were talking about, especially since there was NO context at all, which is unrealistic. stevo --part1_5b.599daccc.2e82ba16_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 2004-09-22 5:21:3= 3 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU> via=20
ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


It's an article of faith = that people are supposed to be able to understand=20
a lujvo, or its underlying tanru, that they have never heard before. &n= bsp;
Usually it works pretty well, but this one fell on its face.  <= /BLOCKQUOTE>

No, I think the test worked very well.  It just shows that the con= cept is not one that people were familiar enough with to know what you were= talking about, especially since there was NO context at all, which is unre= alistic.

stevo --part1_5b.599daccc.2e82ba16_boundary--