From treed@surreality.us Sun Oct 17 11:08:52 2004
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [69.55.227.156] (helo=transfinite.hypercomplex.net ident=root)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1CJFSV-0003dA-TN
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:08:44 -0700
Received: from surreality.us (ca-fontana3b-48.snbrca.adelphia.net [24.55.158.48])
	by transfinite.hypercomplex.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4.swsoft) with ESMTP id i9HI8gUK029826
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:08:43 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by surreality.us with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1CJ8u3-0002js-Bg
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:08:43 +0000
Subject: [lojban] Re: jordis
From: Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <200410170635.04095.phma@phma.hn.org>
References: <200410161228.47334.phma@phma.hn.org>
	 <1097968966.18622.6.camel@ben>  <200410170635.04095.phma@phma.hn.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:08:42 +0000
Message-Id: <1098011322.18622.9.camel@ben>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.0 
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (transfinite.hypercomplex.net [69.55.227.156]); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:08:43 -0700 (
X-archive-position: 8723
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: treed@surreality.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 06:35 -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Saturday 16 October 2004 19:22, Theodore Reed wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 12:28 -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > coi jordis .i pau do du le fanva be la .Abiuord bei le katlana?
> >
> > .i drata me la jordis.
> >
> > .i la jordis.malax. fanva la .Abiuord. .e le drata selsampla pe la
> > gynOm.
> 
> ma la x. ki'a?

Ack. Stupid cmene rules. Malyx then.

> > .iji'a mi malglico xusra .i e'u ko cusku lu xu do fanva li'u .iji'a po'o
> > ni'inai tu'a zo pau do nitcu lo preti valsi
> 
> I meant {do du le fanva}; I had in mind someone who translated, and asserted 
> questioningly that he is Jordi.
> 

Yes, and "do fanva" is an assertion that "do" is someone who translates.
The le is not needed, and is IMO quite malglico.

> phma