From jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com Thu Oct 21 07:17:55 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web51604.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.209]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKdlC-0003IO-MW for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:17:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20041021141711.76772.qmail@web51604.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.57.114.128] by web51604.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:17:11 PDT Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:17:11 -0700 (PDT) From: jordi mas Subject: [lojban] Re: jordis To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <537d06d004102106526f6628fe@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 8827 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:35:27 -0400, Pierre Abbat > wrote: > > My rule of thumb is at most one FA and one SE; One of each? Looks more than enough. That allows all orderings of two arguments, and having three arguments in the same bridi is very seldom. I would have said that two of FA are less hard on the reader than one of Fa and one of SE, but that was just an impression. mu'omi'e jordis. ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com